قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ William Barr interview: The Attorney General says Justice Department and Mueller spared "legal analysis" in Russia report

William Barr interview: The Attorney General says Justice Department and Mueller spared "legal analysis" in Russia report

In an exclusive interview with "CBS This Morning" Attorney General William Barr Robert Mueller and the Justice Department disagreed on the "legal analysis" in the Special Council's report on Russian interference in the presidential election in 2016 elections. Mueller said his inquiry had not caused President Trump to justify justice, nor did he release him. Barr said he believes Mueller could have come to a conclusion about whether the president hindered justice.

During an almost independent interview in Anchorage, CBS News, the legal correspondent, C Crawford, press lawyer on a number of issues from obstruction to his new review of the study in Russia. The lawyer said he was surprised when Mueller told him that he would not decide whether the president prevented justice, but said he did not press him on and then worked with the bar lawyers, stepped in and took the decision himself of evidence Mueller had gathered.

Asked about the fundamental difference between his and Mueller's views on what the evidence collected during Russia's probe means, Barr said: "I think Bob said he would not engage in the analysis. He didn't want to do one decision in one way or another. We analyzed the law and the facts and a group of us spent a lot of time doing it and stated that both legislative and many cases would not pose obstacles. "

" As a matter of law ? " Crawford asked.

"As a matter of law, in other words, we did not agree with the legal analysis, much of the legal analysis in the report. It does not reflect the departments," Barr said. "That was the point of view of a particular lawyer or lawyer, and then we applied what we thought was the right law."

This decision ̵

1; offered in a four-page summary – opened the lawyer's criticism that he was also soft on President Trump.

"I tried to set the bottom line," Barr said, addressing that criticism. "And the bottom line was that Bob Mueller identified some episodes. He didn't reach a conclusion. He gave both sides of the question and he concluded that he didn't liberate the president, but he didn't find a crime either."

Mens Barr testified before the congress on the special council's report, Mueller wants the report to speak for itself and has signaled that he will not testify. Barr said if he does, he is up to him.

Barr says that Mueller "could have made a decision" on the obstacle

"But I think the line he draws, which he must stick to what he said in the report, is the right line for anyone Department employee, "Barr said.

Crawford also asked the lawyer on Mueller's last caution in his remarks that there were "more systematic efforts to interfere in our elections" and how the Ministry of Justice is working to ensure that this does not happen again by 2020. [19659002] "Yes, we have, I believe, an increasingly robust program that focuses on foreign influence in our electoral process," Barr said. "I recently spoke to the director of the FBI to put together a special senior group to ensure that we are fully prepared for the upcoming election."

The president has repeatedly accused former intelligence officials of losing the ball by fixing too much and "spying" on his campaign. Barr testified that he believed to be spying on the Trump campaign, appeared and criticized for using the word "espionage" in particular.

"Yes, I think it has become a dirty word somehow. It has never been to me. I think there is nothing wrong with espionage, the question is always whether it is legally allowed "Barr said.

Some former intelligence officers have said that President Trump has spied a negative connotation with his repeated accusations that the Russia investigation was a witch hunt and a hoax. Critics say the use of the word "spying" by Barr signaled his loyalty to Mr. Trump.

"You know it's part of today's madness that if a president uses a word then suddenly it becomes without boundaries, it's a very good English word, I will continue to use it" Barr said

"What have you seen? What evidence?" Crawford pressed.

"Like many other people familiar with intelligence activities, I had many questions about what was going on," Barr said. "I assumed I would get answers when I went in, and I have not received answers that are well-satisfactory and indeed I have more questions and some of the facts that I have learned are not related with the official explanations of what happened. "

Asked what he meant by Barr saying," That's all I really want to say. It's just not chasing. "

Barr said he meant The government's involvement in an American election is just as dangerous as foreign interference, and therefore he has begun to investigate the actions of the intelligence community during the 2016 election.

He is asked the President's authorization to declassify information that he may consider to be in the public interest.

Source link