Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Sport https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ The Lakers will reportedly give up on Quinn Cook and open up both a list of pitches and flexibility under the hard hood

The Lakers will reportedly give up on Quinn Cook and open up both a list of pitches and flexibility under the hard hood


The Los Angeles Lakers are giving up fifth-year guard Quinn Cook, according to The Athletic’s Shams Charania. Cook, a lifelong Lakers fan who won a championship with the team last season, struggled to find a few minutes in a renewed rotation. The decision serves several purposes from a guard building perspective.

The decision to give up Cook will not cost the Lakers any money from a cap perspective. His contract was non-guaranteed, and the deadline to waive such agreements before they were guaranteed is Saturday, February 27th. The Lakers have apparently decided that they prefer the freedom that deviates from Cook̵

7;s grants rather than retaining him. They can exercise this freedom in different ways.

The simplest would be to just sign another player. The Lakers are reportedly interested in bringing back DeMarcus Cousins, who was dropped by the Houston Rockets over the weekend. However, they could not have immediately signed him because they are pressed up against the hard hood. Using the non-taxable mid-level exemption (on Montrezl Harrell) and the half-yearly exemption (on Wes Matthews) this offseason, the Lakers committed to staying below $ 138.9m. Hard ceiling for the whole season.

They can legally not exceed it for some reason. With just over $ 138 million in salary on their books, they had less than $ 1 million to operate with. They could not even legally have signed another player until February 24, when the assessed portion of the veteran’s minimum would dip low enough to fit within their space. Now they can sign up another player a little earlier. When Cook is gone, they now have two empty roster spots that could potentially be used in the buyout market. As long as they have 14 players when the dust settles, they are free to consider a number of options.

One possible explanation for this step under the radar is that the Lakers wanted to release cash for use in a trade. With so little space under the hard hood before they dropped Cook, they would have struggled to make an unbalanced trade from a cap perspective. Every penny counts, and now the Lakers can possibly absorb a player who earns a little more than someone they send out.

The Lakers have now lost three games in a row without Anthony Davis and Dennis Schroder, and it is becoming clear that their offense has shortcomings that need outside help. How Rob Pelinka will tackle these shortcomings remains to be seen, but relinquishing Cook gives him the flexibility to do so in the way he deems appropriate.

Source link