قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Judge claims $ 38 Million Award to family of Maryland Woman Shot by police

Judge claims $ 38 Million Award to family of Maryland Woman Shot by police



A Baltimore County, Md. Judge this week violated a jury's decision that gave more than $ 38 million to the family of a woman killed by police after an hourly halt, partially streamed live on Instagram. 19659002] The woman, Korryn Gaines, 23, was shot several times by a policeman in Baltimore County in August 2016, sitting in her apartment with her 5-year-old son, Kodi Gaines, nearby. Her son was beaten in the face of the officer's ceasefire.

Almost a year ago, a jury found that the first shot the officer had fired at Mrs Gaines was not fair and awarded compensation on the grounds that the police had violated Gainese's civil rights and had committed battery on mother and son.

But the decision of Thursday by judge Mickey J. Norman of the Baltimore County Circuit Court decided that police officer who shot Mrs Gaines, Royce Ruby, was entitled to qualified immunity, a legal protection used to defend civil liability officials while trading in an official capacity. Critics of the doctrine have argued that it has denied justice to victims of abuse, especially when used for police shooting issues.

In deciding that the protection of Officer Ruby, who is now a corporal, Judge Norman ruled that officers did not violate Mrs Gaines civil rights claimed by the family.

In his 78-page decision, Judge Norman wrote that when he judged whether Officer Ruby was using excessive force, "facts must be investigated from the officer's perspective." and that six hours in the standoff, Mrs Gaines moved from the living room to behind a wall in the kitchen, a position as Officer Ruby said it was a "tactical advantage."

Picture
The police shot Korryn Gaines, 23, several times during a halt in her apartment. She was killed and her son, then 5, had sustained injuries in the shooting.

In February 2018, a jury regularly delegated Kodi Gaines over $ 32.8 million; Karsyn Courtney, Kodi's younger sister, who was not in the apartment at the time of shooting, was awarded more than $ 4.5 million; and Korryn's mother and father were allotted $ 300,000 each, as did the Korryn Gaines property.

Kenneth Ravenell, a lawyer representing Kodi, said in an email that he had planned to appeal the decision. Sir. Ravenell called the judge's opinion "erroneously and legally deficient in many respects" but would not elaborate. The family had not yet collected the money because of Baltimore County's appeal of the jury's decision.

A spokesman for the Baltimore County Executive's office refused to comment.

Police standoff started in Randallstown on August 1, 2016, when officials attempted to serve Mrs Gaines with an arrest warrant after they said she had not been in court on a traffic jam charge. The police also meant an arrest warrant for his girlfriend, Kareem Courtney, 39, whom the police said, was the desire for an assault charge.

According to the order of events laid down in the judge's decision, where county governors encountered Ms. Gaines on the floor of her living room with a shotgun, they called in a SWAT unit and hostage dealers. The judge wrote that the police understood that Mrs Gaines might have had mental problems.

Officer Ruby testified during the trial that he saw Mrs Gaines raising her shotgun with the officers. He said after he had shot the first shot at Mrs Gaines, her shotgun was discharged twice. He testified that he opened fire to her another time because he thought she was going to shoot again.

Mr. Ravenell said last year that Officer Ruby fired his first shot from outside the apartment and knew that Kodi Gaines, the 5-year-old, was in the kitchen with his mother but without being able to see him. The family's legal team disputes that Mrs Gaines raised her shotgun at the officials and, according to the judge's decision, argued that law enforcement officials were protected from damage behind a wall and their protective equipment.

Judge Norman stated that the official "cannot be expected to cool in long-term analysis of all the information he knows in a rapidly changing circumstance, whereby the officer is able to make an immediate choice."

The judge also rejected the claim that Officer Ruby committed the battery to Kodi Gaines because it was not his intention to shoot the young boy. He wrote that a bullet from the officer's first shot hit Kodi's cheek, but did not penetrate it.


Source link