قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ John Dingell was playing in Washington

John Dingell was playing in Washington



J Ohn Dingell, who served his country and the population of Michigan for six decades, died on February 7. We join the rest of Washington to offer our prayers for his soul and his family.

However, our job is to tell the truth without fear or favor. The niceties that most people extend to the deceased cannot be constantly observed by journalists when the deceased is a public figure, especially one who has used so much power and helped shape Washington as much as Dingell has.

We do not suggest that Dingell deserve extraordinary upbreaks. Instead, we say John Dingell, who is the epitome of congress and official Washington for the past few decades, for better and worse.

For example, he played the continuity that makes our democracy strong and the traditions that make America big. He took over his congress ground in 1

955 from his father, John Dingell Sr., who had held it for 22 years and was replaced by his lobster-driven doorwoman.

Congress seats often sit in the same family for many years: Kennedy, Duncan Hunters, Rockefellers, Gores, Frelinghuysens, Fishes and so on. Even our presidency went to Bush-Clinton-Bush (and almost to another Clinton).

Legacy is a central part of the congress. But that doesn't make them a good thing. Dingell, because his father was in Congress, grew up in D.C., attended the Georgetown Prep and prowling the hall in Capitol Hill. He even went to college and law school in D.C. and spent only a few months in Michigan before taking his father's seat. Then he was permanently anced in his home for decades before taking his D.C.-based lobbyist as his wife.

While this pedigree helped Dingell learn Washington's ways of learning, and while clearly reflecting the will of voters, it hardly reflects the founders' idea of ​​a representative like someone from and of a particular place.

In Dingell's defense, commentators will point to his furious defense of Detroit. Again, bringing the bacon home and trying to manage the policy of helping local industries is an honorable tradition in Beltway. But it is also corrupt to have a congressional member working to bail out, subsidize, and protect a pet industry at every turn. But that was what Dingell did.

"Dingell is the big voice for the Big 3 in a tough congress," wrote Automotive News in 1991. Detroit News this week called him "the industry's lighthouse" and GM officials praised his "unimportant support." 19659002] Complicating all this was his marriage to his wife Debbie, a long-standing GM official in Washington who spent time as a lobbyist. People who knew them were telling stories about how close they were and how demanding he was from his "lovely wife Debbie". If John were somewhere, Debbie was there too. She was not just a GM official; she was also a democratically operative. She was about politics and industry. He was about politics and industry. "We're a team," John would say.

Over the years, John Dingell earned his wife's industry, often at the expense of others. He shot protectionist trade policies, injured consumers and imported businesses. He pushed salary and price controls as favored by GM, but injured his suppliers. He was the leading champion of Detroit bailout, which cost the taxpayer more than $ 10 billion. Dollars and undermined free capital capitalism.

Dingell served his country in Congress longer than anyone in history and came to legitimize this industry more than anyone else – both for better and worse.


Source link