On Saturday, Trump said that "US companies can sell their equipment to Huawei," so the transactions will not present a "major national emergency."
In May, the US Department of Commerce banned sales of US-made goods to Huawei without first obtaining a license. US officials have accused the company of working to undermine US security and foreign policy interests.
Trump said Huawei was still part of the ongoing trade discussions between Washington and Beijing, but for now he would move to continue letting American companies sell parts to the Chinese company.
The trading department that issued the ban on Huawei last month did not respond to a request to comment on how it would change the company's status. The White House did not immediately respond to questions about whether it had already asked for trade to review the problem.
Huawei responded to one of the company's official twitter accounts: "U-turn" Donald Trump suggests he allows #Huawei to buy US technology again! "
Huawei has denied allegations of wrongdoing. And it has been lobbied the last few weeks to regain access to US products that are the key to its supply chain.
These companies did not respond promptly to requests for comments on Saturday.
Trump seemed to acknowledge that US suppliers are not satisfied with current policies.
"The US companies were not exactly happy that they could not sell," he said. The United States sells a "huge amount of product" to Huawei, he added.
The prohibition on the purchase of US corporate goods, however, are not the only political obstacle to Huawei's faces in the United States. An executive order Trump signed in May carried US companies from buying or using Huawei telecom gear. Officials said it could pose a espionage risk for Western infrastructure networks.
Huawei, considered world leader in 5G network support technology development, has said that banning the US from ultimately damaging US companies and consumers. 19659004] "Huawei's limitation from doing business in the United States will not make the United States more secure or stronger, but instead it will only serve to limit the United States to inferior yet more expensive alternatives, leaving the US behind in 5G implementation," said one. statement that responded to the notice.