قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ House Judiciary invites Whitaker to clarify testimony

House Judiciary invites Whitaker to clarify testimony



House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (DN.Y.) on Wednesday invited Attorney General Matthew Whitaker to meet with the House panel in the coming days to "clarify" answers during testimony last week.

In a letter to Whitaker, Nadler said lawmakers from both parties felt that Whitaker gave answers to the committee that were "unsatisfactory, incomplete, or contradicted." "You repeatedly refused to offer clear responses regarding your communications with the White House, and you were inconsistent in your application of the department's policy related to the discussion of ongoing investigations, "Considered added.

Whitaker testified before the Judiciary Committee on Feb. 8, tussling with committee Democrats

Nadler pointed to Whitaker's responses to questions regarding whether President Trump Donald John TrumpSchultz won't say if he will sell all Starbucks shares if he becomes president Sarah Sanders cites El Chapo in push for border security Pence rips Omar's "inadequate" apology for tweets criticized as anti-Semitic MORE or his associates reached out to Whitaker to express frustration after Trump's forms lawyer, Michael Cohen, pleaded guilty to lying to Congress.

Whitaker testified during the hearing that Trump did not "lash out" at him after Cohen's plea, and declined to answer another question whether he discussed Cohen's case with Trump.

Cohen's plea

Nadler also referenced Whitaker's questions about whether he discussed his opinions on special counsel Robert Mueller Robert Swan MuellerSasse: US

Whitaker said during his testimony that he spoke with White House officials while interviewing for the position of White House lawyer Ty Cobb's position. Whitaker denied his opinion of the Mueller investigation during that process.

"They did not want to talk about the investigation because the people were dealing with that investigation and that's why they wanted to bring in someone who had been unrelated to the investigation. and the campaign, "he said at the time.

Nadler said in his letter that he is seeking clarification to that answer.

" These are by now the only areas in which we hope you can work on your testimony. , "Disadvantaged added." We continue to seek answers about what may be improper communications you have had with the White House about several ongoing criminal investigations. You left us with questions on some policy matters as well. "

Disappointed stated that he expected Whitaker to provide responses to any unanswered questions just before he gave out of Whitaker's hearing last week. The chairman also said he intended to bring back Whitaker


Source link