قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ World https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ EU backs controversial copyright law

EU backs controversial copyright law



 Sir Tim Berners-Lee </span><br />
                 <span class= Image copyright
Peter Macdiarmid

Image caption

Web pioneer Sir Tim Berners-Lee has warned about the possible consequences of copyright changes
                

The European Parliament has backed controversial copyright laws.

The new rules include holding technology companies responsible for the material posted without proper copyright permission

Many musicians and creators say the new rules will compensate artists fairly ̵

1; but others say they will destroy user-generated content.

The Copyright Directive was backed by 348 MEPs, with 278 against.

The laws on copyright were last amended in 2001.

It has taken several revisions for the current legislation to reach its final form.

The two clauses causing The most controversial are known as Article 11 and Article 13. [11]

Article 13 holds larger technology companies responsible for material without a copyright license

  • What is the controversial article 13?

It does not include cloud storage services and there are already existing exemptions, including parody – which is

Robert Ashcroft, chief executive of PRS for Music, who collects royalties for music artists, welcomed the video clips that go viral. directive as "a massive step forward" for consumers and creatives.

"It's about making sure that ordinary people can upload videos and music to platforms like YouTube without being liable for copyright – that responsibility will be transferred to the platforms, "he said.

However, said that while the latest version of the directive was improved, there remained" legal uncertainty ". k forward to working with policy-makers, publishers, creators and rights holders, as EU member states move to implement these new rules, "it said.

Kathy Berry, senior lawyer at Linklaters, said more detail was required about how article 13 would be enforced.

"While article 13 may have noble aims, its current form functions as little more than a set of ideals. , with very little guidance on what service providers will be caught by what steps will be sufficient to comply, "she said.


Source link