قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Couple's Planned Parenthood For The Cost Of "An Additional Unplanned Child" After Failed Abortion

Couple's Planned Parenthood For The Cost Of "An Additional Unplanned Child" After Failed Abortion



An Idaho couple has filed a lawsuit against Planned Parenthood after a medication abortion failed in 2016.

Albuquerque Journal Bianca Coons and her partner Cristobal Ruiz are suing the organization for $ 765,000, or "cost of raising and unplanned child," as well as damages for emotional stress, negligence, breach of contract, violation of consumer protection laws and unfair trade practices, among other claims.

The lawsuit states that in February 2016 Coons was approximately six weeks pregnant with the couple's third child when she and ruiz decided to travel 700 miles from Boise, Idaho to Albuquerque, New Mexico to visit a Planned Parenthood clinic to obtain an abortion. The choice to travel was to avoid Idaho's mandatory waiting period which would "result in the baby being much more advanced in development."

The couple said they were "destitute" and field they could not afford the cost of another child and

Upon arriving at the clinic in Albuquerque, Coons was given the first of two drugs to begin a medication abortion, commonly referred to as an abortion pill. The abortion pill method is effective 94 to 98 out of 1

00 times in pregnancies of eight weeks or less, Planned Parenthood's website says

Coons took the first pill, mifepristone, while at the clinic and was instructed to take the second pill, misoprostol, 24 hours later

According to the lawsuit, the couple returned to Boise and Coons to the emergency room the next day with severe nausea. During treatment, it was determined that her baby was fine. A doctor at the ER then contacted Planned Parenthood and was informed of the second pill anyway.

Coons' attorney, John McCall, confirmed to the Journal that she did the second pill but declined to comment any further on the case.

The lawsuit states that days later Coons was instructed by Planned Parenthood to take a blood test to determine if she was still pregnant. At that time, Coons asked if she could get a second medication abortion if she was pregnant, and the staff member informed here that she could return to New Mexico for a second round of medication free of charge or pay for the same service in Idaho as Planned Parenthood Clinics operate as a separate business

In early March, Coons customs Planned Parenthood that she couldn't afford a second round of the abortion protocol. "could not morally sanction" a second abortion attempt, the lawsuit reads.

According to the lawsuit, the couple was "deceived into thinking that they could come to New Mexico and initiate the [medication abortion] and then return to Idaho without losing access to 'Planned Parenthood Services.' ”Despite Coons reportedly counting Planned Parenthood staff she was only in New Mexico for the day, the lawsuits adds that the clinic did not inform her that she would have to pay for services in another state

Coons gave birth in August 2016 – one month early – to a baby boy with jaundice and blood sugar problems, the Journal reported. The lawsuit states that Coons and Ruiz worry about the child, now 2 years old, might later reveal a birth defect or other injury as a result of the medication abortion.

"The defendant's failure to properly supervise and administer the abortion service directly This resulted in the failure of the pregnancy termination which resulted in injury to the interests of family planning and their interests in financial planning for the future of their family, the lawsuit reads.

Planned parenthood declined to speak about the lawsuit, citing pending litigation and patient confidentiality

However, The Daily Beast reports that some experts find elements of Coons and Ruiz's case to be strange. Elizabeth Nash, a state policy expert for the Guttmacher Institute, told the digital publication that Idaho's mandatory waiting period for an abortion is 24 hours, which would not have affected the "advanced" development of Coons' unborn child.

Nash also questioned The choice of couple to drive to New Mexico for a procedure when there are other clinics much closer to Boise.

"Just based on geography, you could imagine a person would go to New Mexico for a medication abortion, "Nash customs The Daily Beast . "You could go to Oregon, Colorado, Washington, Montana … Just looking at it on the face of it, it seems that there are other facilities that would be closer."


Source link