Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Health https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Chinese virologist claims coronavirus was boiled up in a military medical facility

Chinese virologist claims coronavirus was boiled up in a military medical facility



A Chinese virologist who claims that coronavirus was boiled up in a military laboratory has published a report which she claims supports her theory.

Li-Meng Yan, who claims to be a former researcher at the Hong Kong School of Public Health, says the virus was built by merging the genetic material into two coronaviruses.

She claims that its tip protein – a structure on the surface of the virus that it uses to bind to cells – was edited to make it easier for the virus to adhere to human cells.

But researchers have slammed her report – which she promised she would release in an interview last week – as ‘unsubstantiated̵

7;, saying it ‘can be given no credibility’.

Research papers have already established the origin of the virus as bats, leading to top experts rejecting suggestions that the virus was created by humans as ‘zero evidence’.

SARS-CoV-2 – the scientific name of the pathogen – is the seventh coronavirus known to infect humans and spread to humans after an earlier version of it mutated. The former virus is thought to be one that infected bats and then reached humans via another animal.

Ms. Yan’s report has not been published in a scientific journal and has not been peer-reviewed, meaning it has not been reviewed and approved by researchers.

But it has received wide public attention and has been viewed more than 150,000 times since it was published yesterday on the website Zenodo, which is run by the European Organization for Nuclear Research.

Ms. Yan published the report online that the coronavirus was designed.  But researchers have previously denied her claims, saying there is 'exactly zero evidence'

Ms. Yan published the report online that the coronavirus was designed. But researchers have previously denied her allegations, saying there is ‘exactly zero evidence’

Donald Trump has previously said he has been told the virus appeared to be genetically engineered

Donald Trump has previously said he has been told the virus appeared to be genetically engineered

Ms Yan writes that her research discounts the theory that coronavirus evolved in nature and then was transmitted to humans, claiming that it ‘lacks significant support’.

‘SARS-CoV-2 shows biological properties that are incompatible with a naturally occurring virus,’ she wrote.

The evidence shows that [the virus] must be a laboratory product created using bat coronavirus ZC45 and / or ZXC21 as template and / or backbone. ‘

She claims that the virus ‘should’ have been built using stocks of these bat viruses, of which she claims that samples are stored in Hong Kong and China.

Donald Trump says he has seen evidence that coronavirus started in Wuhan virology lab

President Donald Trump said he had seen evidence that coronavirus started in the Wuhan virology lab when he warned he could impose tariffs of $ 1 trillion on China in retaliation for the pandemic.

The president made the explosive accusation that coronavirus, which has caused millions of infections and wreaked havoc on the global economy, may have been created in the Chinese laboratory during his coronavirus press briefing on Thursday.

He also suggested that the federal government investigate ways to punish China for triggering the outbreak by imposing tariffs, but he stopped short of saying he would refuse to pay back US debt.

‘Yes I have. “Yes, I have,” Trump said when asked if he had seen evidence that the virus originated at the Wuhan Institute of Technology.

The laboratory is located near a wet market identified as the likely epicenter of the outbreak that occurred later in the year.

However, the president would not reveal what the evidence was that confirmed his suspicion when asked by a reporter.

‘I can not tell you that. I’m not allowed to tell you that, ‘he replied.

Ms Yan also claims that her work shows that the virus could be built in just six months in the report’s abstract, but she does not return to the subject later in the newspaper.

Dr Andrew Preston, an expert in microbial pathogenesis at the University of Bath, blew up his report as ‘reminiscent of a conspiracy theory’.

‘The author’s affiliates are the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation, New York,’ he said.

‘On their website, the vision of this organization is “to allow the people of China to live under a national system based on the rule of law, independent of the political system of the People’s Republic of China” and its mission is “to expose corruption, obstruction, illegality, brutality, false imprisonment “excessive condemnation, harassment and inhumanity prevalent in the political, legal, business and financial system of China”.

‘Given the unfounded allegations in the publication that have not been peer-reviewed, the report cannot be viewed with any credibility as it is.’

Dr Michael Head, a global health expert at the University of Southampton, said the conspiracy theory reported on the report has made “rounds throughout the pandemic”.

‘Ultimately, it can be detrimental to public health if it is reported non-critically without looking at the broader evidence,’ he said.

‘If people are exposed to and then believe in conspiracy theories, this is likely to have a negative impact on efforts to keep Covid-19 cases low, and thus there will be more deaths and illnesses than are needed.

‘The genomics of the virus have previously been separated, for example a peer-reviewed paper from Nature, where they say “Our analyzes clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory constructed or a targeted engineered virus”.

‘Other evidence also shows that this type of coronavirus has existed in bats for decades.

‘This new manuscript has not been peer reviewed and obviously does not offer data that overrides previous research.’

Her accusations have not been backed up by scientific articles or scientists, with reports that the virus was created, previously condemned as conspiracy theories.

In research from the Scripps Research Institute, the University of Edinburgh and other universities, researchers from the respected journal Nature Medicine wrote in March that SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh coronavirus known to infect humans.

‘It is unlikely that SARS-CoV-2 arose through laboratory manipulation of a related SARS-CoV-like coronavirus,’ they said.

‘The genetic data irrevocably show that SARS-CoV-2 is not derived from any previously used viral backbone.’

Why did China build a virus lab in Wuhan?

A worker is seen inside Wuhan on February 23, 2017

A worker is seen inside Wuhan on February 23, 2017

Chinese officials decided to build the Wuhan Institute of Virology after the country was ravaged by an outbreak of SARS in 2002 and 2003.

SARS, another form of coronavirus, killed 775 people and infected more than 8,000 globally in an epidemic that lasted about eight months.

It took the Chinese 15 years to complete the project, which cost a total of 300 million yuan (£ 34 million). The French helped design the building.

Its crown jewel is a four-story laboratory with the highest level of biosafety on P4.

It is the most advanced laboratory of its kind in China.

The construction of the laboratory was completed in 2015 and it officially opened on January 5, 2018 after passing various safety inspections.

As a description of the importance of the P4 laboratory, China Youth Online billed it as an ‘aircraft carrier in China’s virology’. The state newspaper said it ‘is able to investigate the deadly pathogens’.

One researcher, Zhou Peng, told the state news agency Xinhua in 2018: ‘We are proud to say that we are already at the forefront of research into the immunity mechanism of bats that carry viruses for a long time.

Bats carry viruses but are not infected [by them]. [They] give man hope to study how to fight viruses. ‘

Dr. Kristian Andersen, from the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California, said the genetic material clearly pointed to a natural origin of the virus.

‘There is a lot of data and a lot of evidence as well as previous examples that this comes from nature,’ he said. ‘We have exactly zero evidence or data that this has any connection to a laboratory.’

Dr. Angela Rasmussen, an infection and immunity expert at Columbia University, New York, said the site where the virus binds to human cells has a ‘suboptimal’ adaptation, suggesting it was not designed.

‘In addition, there are no genetic similarities with other viral backbones used in any of the known (viral systems),’ she said. ‘This suggests that this virus was not constructed.’

In addition, nonsense claims the virus was built, Trevor Bedford of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle told the American Association for the Advancement of Science in February: ‘There is no evidence of genetic engineering that we can find.

‘The proof we have is that the mutations (in the virus) are completely in line with natural evolution.’

By that time, more than 100 genetic sequences of the virus had already been published.

A more widely accepted theory suggests that the virus came from bats before jumping to humans via another intermediate source.

Ms Yan wrote in her paper that theories that the virus is from nature and the meat market in Wuhan are a ‘smoke screen’, claiming that she was told this by CDC researchers working in China.

She has previously accused Beijing of lying when it heard about the killer infection and participating in an extensive hideout.

Ms Yan claims she fled to Hong Kong and fled to America in April to ‘raise awareness’ of the pandemic.

She claims she worked at the Hong Kong School of Public Health, a reference laboratory of the World Health Organization, but she was cut off after trying to warn people about transmitting the virus from person to person in December.

She also claims that before leaving China, her information was deleted from the government database.

The lab has denied that Ms Yan has ever ‘conducted any research into human-to-human transmission’, saying her claims have ‘no scientific basis’.

It has been claimed that the Wuhan laboratory in China, pictured above, is where coronavirus was developed.  However, there is no evidence to support this claim

It has been claimed that the Wuhan laboratory in China, pictured above, is where coronavirus was developed. However, there is no evidence to support this claim

In April, incumbent US President Donald Trump claimed he had seen evidence that coronavirus was being built in a laboratory in Wuhan when he suggested the government could impose sanctions on China in response.

‘Yes I have. “Yes, I have,” Trump said when asked if he had seen evidence that the virus originated at the Wuhan Institute of Technology.

However, the president would not reveal what the evidence was that confirmed his suspicion when asked by a reporter.

‘I can not tell you that. I’m not allowed to tell you that, ‘he replied.

The laboratory in question is located near the wet market in Wuhan, which is believed to have been the center of the eruption.


Source link