Specifically, the summary highlights significant issues with the department’s alertness when it comes to equipment maintenance, civilian disruption policy, and intelligence handling prior to the attack.
The broader intelligence-related shortcomings described in the report appear from a warning received by the Capitol Police from the Department of Homeland Security on December 21
On that day, the Department of Homeland Security Department announced a blog referring to tunnels on U.S. Capitol grounds used by lawmakers and research on the website identified four ‘threads / blog topics containing worrying comments,’ “it said. that in the summary.
“The report identifies the website as https://thedonald.win and includes several pages of comments posted to the website,” it adds.
The report reveals, for the first time, an astonishing degree of indifference on the part of Capitol police management when it comes to routine household items, such as failing to maintain an accurate list of officers assigned to the Civil Disturbance Unit.
The summary notes that the “CDU” list listed 187 officers, two of whom no longer worked for the Capitol Police on the day of the uprising. The 187 officers listed are far lower than the 276 officers acting Capitol Police Chief Yogananda Pittman told Congress was active on January 6th.
Furthermore, the report pointed out that the management of the Capitol Police knew as far back as July 2020 that the department needed to make significant changes, but that made it inexplicable.
The summary lists several examples, including a lack of department to establish standard operating procedures for the Civil Disturbance Unit, highlighting a relaxed attitude towards the unit ultimately tasked with stopping the insurgency.
Expired ammunition and ineffective shields
Even equipment maintenance seemed to have low priority. The summary shows that the CDU shields were not stored at the correct temperature, making them ineffective while some ammunition in the armor had expired.
In another example, the Inspector General wrote that a department official told investigators that officers receive training every three years as required by the manufacturer of a weapon carried by officers, but the department had no formal directive ordering them to complete the training. .
On the day of the uprising, the CDU did not use all of its less lethal options, such as a 40 mm grenade launcher, 37 mm grenade launcher and Sting Ball grenades due to “orders from management.”
Eventually, the unit operated “at a reduced level of preparedness” due to the many errors, the report says.
The summary describes a lack of standards for the Capitol Police’s critical intelligence gathering and assessment arm, and that the department did not follow the few procedures it had. For example, not all members of the intelligence department had top-secret security clearances in their roles, “which could have resulted in the department misusing classified information” and did not have a training program for all employees in the division.
The summary says the Capitol Police intelligence was adjusted in the fall of 2020 after it became clear that the unit “did not meet the department’s requirements.”
As the department prepared for what it believed would be a rally on Jan. 6, it turned out that conflicting intelligence was problematic, according to the report.
“The explanation that OIG provides for this is astounding,” the summary says. “‘Bottom Line Up Front’ (BLUF) says they are tracking protests that may include some armed protesters and white supremacy, and the assessment 30 pages later is far more alarming, including that conditions on the ground could ‘lead to a markedly dangerous situation. for both law enforcement and the public. “CNN has previously reported that the department’s intelligence department concluded that threats of violence were ‘unlikely’.
The summary lists 27 recommendations for corrections, including changing procedures to “refine document reporting that better captures operational impact to include unlikely results based on intelligence, trend data, threats to members, and information analysis.”
The USCP inspector is expected to testify at Capitol Hill next week about the report and his findings.
This story has been updated with additional information from the report overview.