قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ World https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Brexit Vote: Parliament decides on E.U. Withdrawal Plan

Brexit Vote: Parliament decides on E.U. Withdrawal Plan



For Great Britain, the big voice is finally here.

After two and a half years of negotiations, arguments, predictions and attitudes, Parliament will finally decide on Tuesday on a bill dictating the conditions for Britain's departure from the European Union, one of the most sought-after voices that legislators will probably throw in their career.

• Prime Minister Theresa May has spent all his energies trying to convince Parliament – and Britain – that the divorce she is negotiating with Brussels is the best way forward. But she hasn't made the sale. The House of Commons is expected to defeat the agreement with a wide margin, and no one is absolutely sure what's coming next.

• There is much at stake: Britain's place in Europe, its economic future and possibly the survival of wife. Mays Conservative Government. Debate must end late in the afternoon, with a vote scheduled to start at. 19:00. in London (2 pm east).

• For Mrs May, voting is an exercise in injury control: a serious loss would make it more difficult to extract further concessions from the EU and could give rise to a vote on non-confidence.

• Assuming that the deal does not go, Mrs May must return to Parliament on Monday with a reserve plan. If nothing was approved on March 29, Britain would make a "no-deal" departure from the block, which could pose serious financial risks. (Many lawmakers are concerned about this. Voices not so much.)

The vote will give some of the details that businesses need to plan their operations, but it could at least narrow down the possibilities.

"The longer this Brexit political drama continues, the less and less attractive Britain will be" to investors, Iain Anderson, CEO of the consulting firm Cicero Group, said last week.

Although many companies are already preparing for the worst case – crashing out of the EU without an agreement in place – many have also been vocal in warning against it.

"Don't make mistakes, no actions can't be controlled," says Carolyn Fairbairn, director general of UK industry last week.

The government has tried, in vain, to facilitate public anxiety about how a no-deal scenario would be managed. Last week, it created an artificial traffic jam to test how it would cope with border disturbances, an exercise that was widely prevented.

Manufacturers are still concerned that a non-situation would cause chaos in just-in-time manufacturing, based on goods crossing the British border, sometimes several times, and arriving within minutes of collection. – Amie Tsang

There are many objections to the Brexit bill, making it clear that no approach to leaving the European Union orders something close to majority support.

The hard-line pro-Brexit Conservatives claim that the deal binds Britain much too close to European trade rules in the foreseeable future. Many even claim that a non-departure from the block would be preferable.

The 1998 agreement that brought peace to Northern Ireland guarantees the free movement of goods and people between that part of Britain and the Republic of Ireland, an EU member. But many conservatives and the Democratic Unionist Party, a small group in Northern Ireland united with the British Government, protest against how Mrs Mays agreement would protect this guarantee.

The agreement reached by Prime Minister Theresa May with Brussels includes a "backstop" that would keep Northern Ireland closer to the block than with the rest of Britain if the two parties are unable to reach a long-term agreement by the end by 2020. Critics say it would effectively split Britain into two. [19659002] There are legislators in several parties who oppose Brexit in any form and want another referendum. And Mrs May has accused the opposition party of political opportunism by simply resisting something that her government is trying to do. – Richard Pérez-Peña

Last week, a MEP proposed an amendment calling for Prime Minister Theresa May to return within three days to announce what the government would do next time the original agreement was rejected. She had 21 days earlier to decide.

According to Parliament's arcane rules (which is mainly related to the importance of "immediately"), Mr Bercow should have rejected this amendment. But he didn't. And Parliament adopted it with a small margin.

The decision individually dragged the balance of power to parliament from Mrs May & # 39; s government. The episode made a smaller exit less likely and would let lawmakers weigh in – quickly – with alternatives.

And Mr Bercow may not have finished yet. Commentators said it could end up being the most radical shift in the relationship between government and parliament when the speaker believed King Charles I in 1642. – Benjamin Mueller


Source link