New Uncommanded Dive Risks
Last week, the FAA issued a statement on a new risk of Boeing mitigating. The new risk does not involve MACS, but can lead to similar results under the Seattle Times.
The Federal Aviation Administration discovered that data processing of an aircraft computer on the jet liner could cause the aircraft to dive in a way that pilots had difficulty recovering in simulator tests according to two people familiar with the result being requested not to be named and discussed it.
While the issue did not involve the maneuvering feature-enhancement system associated with the two accidents since October, killing 346 people, it could produce an uncommanded dive similar to the one that occurred in the collapse, according to a non-authorized person. to talk about the matter.
David Learmount, Aviation Safety Advisor at Flight Global and a former Royal Air Force pilot, said the details of the new issue have been outlined, but it may further delay MAX's return. "The implication is that this is different software in another control computer that presents similar symptoms," he said. "When you control a plane with computers as we do now, you've always had the potential for trouble."
Boeing agreed with FAA results but has not yet submitted a correction to the FAA.
DoJ Probe expands to Dreamliner
The Seattle Times reports DOJ probe extends beyond the Boeing 737 MAX, including 787 Dreamliner.
Federal prosecutors have Boeing's judgments regarding the production of 787 Dreamliner in South Carolina, where there have been claims of shoddy work, according to two sources familiar with the investigation.
The grounds of the judgment were issued by the Ministry of Justice (DOJ), the sources say. DOJ also conducts a criminal investigation into the certification and designed by 737 MAX for two deadly crashes of that jetliner. The 787 application extends the significance of DOJ & # 39; s investigation into security issues at Boeing.
The groundbreaking investigation of the MAX has been kept secret, but some of the Ministry of Justice's activities have become known as prosecutors issued papers for documents. 787 Dreamliner claims have centered on foam work and cut corners at the company's South Carolina plant.
Prosecutors probably assess whether there are major cultural issues throughout the company, according to the third source and a person in South Carolina, who also spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the senses. It could include pressure to unsubscribe from defective work to avoid delays in delivering aircraft to customers, the source says .
The entire [Dreamliner] fleet was founded in January 2013 after two overheating events: a battery fire on an empty 787 parked at the gate of Boston airport, then a smoldering battery on a flight in Japan, forcing an emergency landing. The FAA raised the founding in April 2013, after Boeing had changed the jet aircraft with collected batteries, containment boxes and venting pipes.
In the 737 MAX study, the prosecutors seem to get information from someone with inside knowledge of the aircraft's development-based approach On the questions they ask, the third source said.
$ 9 one hour programmers with no aviation experience
Shoddy work and cut corners? Uh … Yeah.
Bloomberg reports [Boeing’s 737 Max Software Outsourced to $9-an-Hour Engineers] (Boeings 737 Max Software handed out to $ 9 one-hour engineers)
It remains the mystery of the heart of the Boeing Co.s 737 Max Crisis: how a company known for meticulous design apparently did basic software errors that led to a couple of deadly crashes. Longtime Boeing engineers say the effort was complicated by a push to outsource work to lower paid contractors.
Max software – plagued by problems that could keep the plans grounded for months after the US regulators this week revealed a new bug – was developed at a time, Boeing was put on experienced engineers and pressured suppliers to cut costs.
Increasingly, the iconic US planner and its subcontractors have relied on temporary workers producing as little as $ 9 an hour to develop and test software, often from countries lacking a deep background in space – especially India .
In offices facing Seattle's Boeing Field, recent college students employed by Indian software developer HCL Technologies Ltd. several rows of desks, said Mark Rabin, a former Boeing software engineer who worked in a flight test group that supported Max.
Coders from HCL typically designed for specifications see by Boeing. Still, "it was controversial because it was far less effective than Boeing engineers who just wrote the code," Rabin said. Often he reminded me that took many rounds back and forth because the code was not done correctly . "
Boeing has not only benefited from cheap coders, who did not know what they were doing, Bloomberg notes, that Boeing's Indian business seemed to pay other dividends.
Boeing won several orders for Indian military and commercial aircraft, such as $ 22 billion in January 2017 to deliver SpiceJet Ltd. This order included 100 737-Max 8 jets and represented Boeing's largest order ever from an Indian airline, a coup in a country dominated by Airbus.  Grounded for Cause
The Wall Street Journal reports the Boeing 737 MAX, which is likely to be grounded late this year.
Boeing Co & apos; s worried 737 MAX fleet is expected to be grounded until the end of the year as a result of the latest aviation problem identified by US aviation security regulators, according to people who were informed of the issue.  The impact is expected at least e to cause further disturbances to the airplanes in the US and abroad, as approx. 500 of the aircraft remain idle for months longer than previously expected.
During simulator tests of some emergency procedures, FAA pilots uncovered a potentially hazardous situation they had not encountered before, people said on the issue. The problem, according to Boeing's official and company airline announcements, is that if a chip inside the aircraft's flight control computer fails, it may cause indefinite movement of a panel on the aircraft's tail and point its nose down. 19659031] Testing the emergency procedures to cope with this so-called running stabilizer condition, the official said, showed that it would take average pilots longer than expected to recognize and counteract the problem.
Darn those Simulators
When you use actual flight simulators instead of iPad's problems emerge. But all the time Boeing has insisted and still insists on iPads, all pilots have to train.
No new parts required
"We believe this can be updated through a software solution," said a Boeing official.
Of course it does.
It may take many months if the 737 fleet needs new parts.
What may be wrong?
Boeing took a base 1964 design, overloaded it with large engines that made the plane unstable, depending on poorly designed software that cannot easily be overridden to keep the aircraft from nosediving in crash, while insistent training can take place on a iPad.
What could possibly go wrong with the set of cost-saving decisions?
Unfortunately, we just found out.
Even after the second crash, Boeing asked the FAA to keep the plane in use.
Mike "Mish" Shedlock