قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Health https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ AI Is Good (Perhaps Too Good) at Predicting Who Will Be The Prematurely

AI Is Good (Perhaps Too Good) at Predicting Who Will Be The Prematurely



 AI Is Good (Perhaps Too Good) at Predicting Who Will Be The Prematurely

Can AI When When You're Going To?

Credit: Shutterstock

Medical researchers have unlocked an unsettling ability in artificial intelligence (AI): predicting a person's early death. Then, they tasked the AI ​​with predictions if individuals were at risk of dying prematurely ̵

1; in other words, so than the average life expectancy – from chronic disease, they reported in a new study.

The predictions of early death that were made at AI algorithms were "significantly more accurate" than predictions delivered by a model that did not use machine learning, lead study author Dr. Stephen Weng, an assistant professor of epidemiology and data science at the University of Nottingham (UN) in the UK, said in a statement. [Can Machines Be Creative? Meet 9 AI ‘Artists’]

To evaluate the likelihood of subjects' premature mortality, the researchers tested two types of AI: "deep learning," in which layered information-processing networks help a computer to learn from examples; and "random forest," a simpler type of AI that combines multiple, tree-like models to consider possible outcomes.

Then, they compared the AI ​​models' conclusions to results from a standard algorithm, known as the Cox model. 19659005] Using these three models, the scientists evaluated data in the UK Biobank – an open-access database of genetic, physical and health data – submitted at more than 500,000 people between 2006 and 2016. During that time, nearly 14,500 of the participants died. , different from cancer, heart disease and respiratory diseases

All three models determined by factors such as age, gender, smoking history and a prior cancer diagnosis were top variables for assessing the likelihood of a person's early death . But the models diverged over other key factors, the researchers found. [TheCoxmodelleanedheavilyonethnicityandphysicalactivitywhilethemachine-learningmodelsdidnotBycomparisontherandomforestmodelplacedgreateremphasisonbodyfatpercentagewaistcircumferencetheamountoffruitandvegetablesthatpeopleateandskintoneaccordingtothestudyForthedeep-learningmodeltopfactorsincludedexposuretojob-relatedhazardsandairpollutionalcoholintakeandtheuseofcertainmedications

When all the number crunching was done, the deep-learning algorithm delivered the most accurate predictions , identifying 76 percent of subjects who died during the study period. By comparison, the random forest model correctly predicted about 64 percent of premature deaths, while the Cox model identified only about 44 percent.

This is not the first time that experts have harnessed AI's predictive power for health care. In 2017, a different team of researchers showed that AI could learn to spot early signs of Alzheimer's disease; their algorithm with brain scans to predict if a person would be likely to develop Alzheimer's, and it did so with about 84 percent accuracy, live science previously reported.

Another study found that AI could predict the onset of autism in 6 months -old babies that were at high risk of developing the disorder. Yet another study could detect signs of encroaching diabetes through analysis of retina scans; and one more – also using data derived from retinal scans – predicted the likelihood of a patient experiencing a heart attack or stroke.

In the new study, the scientists showed that machine learning – "with careful tuning" – can be used to successfully co-authored mortality outcomes over time, study co-author Joe Kai, a UN professor of primary care, said in the statement.

While using AI may be unfamiliar to many health care professionals, presenting the methods used in the study "could help with scientific verification and future development of this exciting field," Kai said.

The findings were published online today (March 27) in the journal PLOS ONE.

Originally published on Live Science .


Source link