Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ World https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Actual Control: Trump says he is a "very honest guy" while making several false claims

Actual Control: Trump says he is a "very honest guy" while making several false claims

Before and after this statement, he made false allegations about Barack Obama, NATO and tariffs.

"He called Kim Jong Un on several occasions to meet," Trump said. "President Obama wanted to meet with Kim Jong Un, and Kim Jong Un said no. Numerous times he called."

Facts First: As CNN was posted in a comprehensive bill earlier the week there is no evidence that Obama has ever tried to secure a meeting with Kim Jong Un, let alone he called " North Korea "on several occasions. "

Several former Obama officials, including former security adviser Susan Rice and former deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes, have been on record to declare Trump's claim false. Independent experts contacted by CNN also said that Trump was wrong Obama's administration occasionally made diplomatic outreach to North Korea, but its primary intention was to convince Kim Jong Un and his father and predecessor Kim Jong Il to return to the six-country negotiations that had been merged. known to have been floated at any time.

Obama pursued a policy, commonly known as "strategic patience", of falling into direct engagement with the Kim regime at all, let alone at presidential level as long as they refused to stop their belligerent behavior.

Charges on China

Trump again claimed that China widow ll pay for US rates.

"(B) y the way, billions and billions of dollars of tariffs come in and China pays for it, not our people."

Facts First: No matter how many times Trump makes this claim ( and he has made it very recently ), it is wrong to say that China is paying the tariffs. The majority of the cost of these tariffs falls on US consumers and businesses.
CNN's facts First team has examined this claim from Trump several times. Here's what we found:

Economic studies have found that US consumers carry most of the weight of these tariffs, not China.

Two recent papers have found that tariffs on Chinese goods have raised US consumer prices because importers often pass on prices to domestic producers, who sometimes increase the price of their product to cover their costs and sometimes eat the price. self.

  These are 4 winners of the US-China trade war
A March paper from economists in Columbia, Princeton and the New York Federal Reserve found it "full Incidence "of Trump's rates has fallen on domestic companies and consumers – costing them $ 3 billion a month by the end of 2018. The paper also showed that the tariffs led to a reduction of US $ 1.4 billion in US revenue. dollars a month.
A separate academic document also found that tariffs resulted in higher consumer prices. It is estimated that tariffs will result in a decrease of 7.8 billion. Dollars a year.

The Chinese supplier may take some of the burden of the tariff by reducing its prices to maintain a US market, but these studies show that the burden is sharply falling on US consumers and businesses.

For their part, the Scientific Economic Report of the President, who was also released in March, recognized that US consumers are paying some of the cost of these tariffs. Domestic producers according to the report benefit from price increases from tariffs, but "offsetting these benefits is the cost consumers pay in terms of higher prices and reduced consumption."

Ivanka jobs

[19659008] On Friday, Trump presented reporters in the White House and praised his daughter Ivanka for her work with jobs.

"Ivanka has worked on nearly 10 million jobs, coaches and goes to businesses and makes them employ people," Trump

Facts First: Trump is right that Ivanka has worked on job training , but it is not true that 10 million jobs have been created.

Last July, Trump signed a decree establishing the National Council of the American Workers, co-chairman of Ivanka Trump and Minister of Commerce Wilbur Ross. One of the Council's priorities is to ask companies across the United States to sign the pledge to US workers. The promise involves "committing to expanding programs that train, train, and reschedule American high school age workers," according to the White House.
  Ivanka Trump: Advisor, daughter and this week's diplomat

Two hundred and two companies have agreed the undertaking, each providing different numbers of training opportunities. According to the White House's website, the total number of possible pledges of just over 9.9 million.
Earlier this year, CNN checked a similar – but not identical – claim that Trump had made millions of jobs. It wasn't true.

This time, Trump draws closer to the truth by saying she "worked on" job creation. But exaggerate what the administration has secured from companies.

It is true that Ivanka works with companies on job training programs. But it is not correct to say that they are all new jobs. Instead, they are training opportunities. In a press release last year, the White House described these opportunities as "apprenticeships and work-based learning, continuing education, job creation and recognition". These opportunities may be for current employees.

Many of these possible options were already planned by the companies. As CNN previously reported, Walmart's five-year lifting amount would almost match the rate its program Walmart Academies has trained since its inception in 2016. Associated Builders and Contractors give a similar example as it pledged to give just as much many opportunities in five years as it trains in a year.

So it is inaccurate to suggest that the number of training opportunities that are pledged is "jobs". The timeline of these options spans five years. And many of them match existing business goals and numbers.

This story is updated.

Source link